Acute Impacts of Ionizing Radiation Exposure on the Gastrointestinal Tract and Gut Microbiome in Mice.

Radiation therapy for abdominopelvic malignancies often results in damage to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and permanent changes in bowel function. An overlooked component of the pathophysiology of radiation-induced bowel injury is the role of the gut microbiome. The goal of this research was to identify the impacts of acute radiation exposure on the GIT and gut microbiome. C57BL/6 mice exposed to whole-body X-rays (0.1-3 Gy) were assessed for histological and microbiome changes 48 h post-radiation exposure. Within the ileum, a dose of 3 Gy significantly decreased crypt depth as well as the number of goblet cells, but increased overall goblet cell size. Overall, radiation altered the microbial distribution within each of the main phyla in a dose- and tissue-dependent manner. Within the Firmicutes phylum, high dose irradiation resulted in significant alterations in bacteria from the class Bacilli within the small bowels, and from the class Clostridia in the large bowels. The 3 Gy radiation also significantly increased the abundance of bacterial families from the Bacteroidetes phylum in the colon and feces. Overall, we identified various alterations in microbiome composition following acute radiation exposure, which could potentially lead to novel biomarkers for tracking patient toxicities or could be used as targets for mitigation strategies against radiation damage.

Broad analgesic activity of a novel, selective M1 agonist.

Although the muscarinic receptor family has long been a source of potentially compelling targets for small molecule drug discovery, it was difficult to achieve agonist selectivity within the family. A new class of M1 muscarinic agonists has emerged, and these compounds have been characterized as agonists that activate the receptor at an allosteric site. Members of this class of M1 agonists have been shown to be selective across the muscarinic receptors. However, upon introduction of a novel pharmacologic mechanism, it is prudent to ensure that no new off-target activities have arisen, particularly within the context of in vivo experiments. Reported here, is the in vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel M1 agonist tool compound, PPBI, and demonstrations that the primary biological effects of PPBI are mediated through M1. PPBI reverses d-amphetamine locomotor activity, but fails to do so in transgenic mice that do not express M1. PPBI also reverses a natural deficit in a rat cognition model at a level of exposure which also activates cortical circuitry. Most notably, PPBI is analgesic in a variety of rat and mouse models and the analgesic effect of PPBI is reversed by an M1-preferring antagonist and an M1-selective toxin. Finally, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic measures of PPBI are compared across multiple endpoints which highlights that activity in models of psychosis and pain require higher exposures than that required in the cognition model.

Comparing label-free biosensors for pharmacological screening with cell-based functional assays.

The diversity and impact of label-free technologies continues to expand in drug discovery. Two classes of label-free instruments, using either an electrical impedance-based or an optical-based biosensor, are now available for investigating the effects of ligands on cellular targets. Studies of GPCR function have been especially prominent with these instruments due to the importance of this target class in drug discovery. Although both classes of biosensors share similar high sensitivity to changes in cell shape and structure, it is unknown whether these biosensors yield similar results when comparing the same GPCR response. Furthermore, since cell morphology changes induced by GPCRs differ depending on which G-protein is activated, there is potential for these instruments to have differential sensitivities to G-protein signaling. Here 1 impedance (CellKey)- and 2 optical-based instruments (BIND and Epic) are compared using Gi-coupled (ACh M2), Gq-coupled (ACh M1), and Gs-coupled (CRF1) receptors. All 3 instruments were robust in agonist and antagonist modes yielding comparable potencies and assay variance. Both the impedance and optical biosensors showed similar high sensitivity for detecting an endogenous D1/D5 receptor response and a melanocortin-4 receptor inverse agonist (agouti-related protein). The impedance-based biosensor was uniquely able to qualitatively distinguish G-protein coupling and reveal dual signaling by CRF1. Finally, responses with a ligand-gated ion channel, TRPV1, were similarly detectable in each instrument. Thus, despite some differences, both impedance- and optical-based platforms offer robust live-cell, label-free assays well suited to drug discovery and typically yield similar pharmacological profiles for GPCR ligands.